Ruth Pearson

3.3k citations
62 papers · 1.7k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Ruth Pearson

58 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Ruth Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Public Administration 229
  • Gender Studies 398
  • Business and International Management 70
  • Strategy and Management 293
  • Sociology and Political Science 787
Replace Diane Elson with:
Diane Elson United Kingdom
Lourdes Benería United States
June Nash United States
Diane Perrons United Kingdom
Kanchana N. Ruwanpura United Kingdom
Richard Anker United States
Angela M. Eikenberry United States
Stephen Gill Canada
Jane Jenson Canada
Jan Breman Netherlands
Ruth Pearson relative to Diane Elson United Kingdom Diane Elson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Diane Elson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Pearson. The network helps show where Ruth Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Pearson Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1981417
2
Feminist Visions of Development: Gender Analysis and Policy
2005261
3 1981100
4 200779
5 200178
6 201567
7 201147
8
Women and credit : researching the past, refiguring the future
200144
9 200337
10 200435
11 200030
12 201930
13 199728
14 201027
15 200425
16 201024
17 201323
18 201223
19 198922
20 201218

About Ruth Pearson

Ruth Pearson is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Public Administration, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management and Finance, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (14 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (7 papers), Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (6 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (6 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (5 papers), International Labor and Employment Law (4 papers), Microfinance and Financial Inclusion (4 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (229 citations), Gender Studies (398 citations), Business and International Management (70 citations), Strategy and Management (293 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (787 citations). Ruth Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Thailand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Diane Elson, Cecile Jackson, Kyoko Kusakabe, Gill Seyfang, Sundari Anitha, Linda McDowell, Beverly Lemire, Caroline Sweetman, Shahra Razavi and Rhys Jenkins. Their work appears in journals such as Gender & Development, Feminist Review, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Gender Place & Culture and IDS Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact