Ruth Ames

55 papers receiving 4.8k citations

Ruth Ames's Hit Papers

Vascular events in healthy older women receiving calcium supplementation: randomised controlled trial 2008 · 496 citations
4960+6+12Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Ruth Ames
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 2.4k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.7k
  • Nephrology 500
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 614
  • Physiology 624
Replace Ian M. Dick with:
Ian M. Dick Australia
S Arnaud France
Peder Charles Denmark
Harald Dobnig Austria
Allan G. Need Australia
M C Chapuy France
P. Rødbro Denmark
Anne Horne New Zealand
Ib Transbøl Denmark
Gregory D. Gamble New Zealand
Ruth Ames relative to Ian M. Dick Australia Ian M. Dick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ian M. Dick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Ames

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Ames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Ames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Ames more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Ames

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Ames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Ames. The network helps show where Ruth Ames may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Ames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Ames Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Ames links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Vascular events in healthy older women receiving calcium supplementation: randomised controlled trial
Hit paper breakdown →
2008496
2 1993433
3 1995341
4 2006215
5 1991202
6 1991198
7 2002194
8 2007169
9 2005160
10 1993153
11 2000151
12 2010149
13 1994136
14 1995125
15 1993123
16 2005122
17 1993110
18 2008108
19 2009107
20 1994103

About Ruth Ames

Ruth Ames is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Nephrology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Physiology, having authored 56 papers that have together received 5.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bone health and osteoporosis research (27 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (12 papers), Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (6 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (4 papers), Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research (3 papers), Body Composition Measurement Techniques (3 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (2 papers) and Hormonal and reproductive studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (2.4k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.7k citations), Nephrology (500 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (614 citations) and Physiology (624 citations). Ruth Ames has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Ian R. Reid, Greg Gamble, Anne Horne, Margaret C. Evans, Andrew Grey, Mark J Bolland, M C Evans, Susan J. Sharpe, Gregory D. Gamble and Barbara Mason. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Osteoporosis International, The American Journal of Medicine, Clinical Endocrinology and Maturitas.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact