Ronald E. Prather
Impact in
- Software top 5%
- Software Reliability and Analysis Research
- Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
- Information Systems top 5%
- Software Engineering Research
- Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
Papers in
-
- Logic, programming, and type systems 12
- Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies 4
- Algorithms and Data Compression 3
-
- Software Engineering Research 10
Ronald E. Prather
34 papers receiving 251 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Software 136
- Information Systems 144
- Computer Science Applications 21
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 54
- Artificial Intelligence 100
Countries citing papers authored by Ronald E. Prather
This map shows the geographic impact of Ronald E. Prather's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ronald E. Prather with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ronald E. Prather more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ronald E. Prather
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ronald E. Prather. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ronald E. Prather. The network helps show where Ronald E. Prather may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Ronald E. Prather, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1984 | 55 | |
| 2 | 1987 | 47 | |
| 3 | Discrete Mathematical Structures for Computer Science | 1976 | 31 |
| 4 | 1983 | 18 | |
| 5 | 1981 | 16 | |
| 6 | Software Metrics: A Rigorous Approach, by Norman Fenton, Chapman and Hall, 1991 (Book Review). | 1991 | 14 |
| 7 | 1995 | 14 | |
| 8 | Introduction to Switching Theory: a Mathematical Approach | 1967 | 12 |
| 9 | 1987 | 11 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 9 | |
| 11 | 1980 | 7 | |
| 12 | 1978 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1988 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1988 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1977 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1993 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1960 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1978 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1976 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1970 | 3 |
About Ronald E. Prather
Ronald E. Prather is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Software and Computer Science Applications, having authored 40 papers that have together received 297 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, programming, and type systems (12 papers), Software Engineering Research (10 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (7 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (7 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (6 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (4 papers), semigroups and automata theory (4 papers) and Algorithms and Data Compression (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (136 citations), Information Systems (144 citations), Computer Science Applications (21 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (54 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (100 citations). Ronald E. Prather has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Judith D. Schlesinger and Gunther Schuller. Their work appears in journals such as The Computer Journal, Theory of Computing Systems, ACM SIGPLAN Notices, Journal of the ACM and Notes.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.