Roger Wright
Impact in
- Classics top 2%
- Medieval Literature and History
- Linguistics and Language top 5%
- Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Papers in
-
- Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies 21
- Historical Linguistics and Language Studies 15
- Linguistics and language evolution 12
- Medieval European Literature and History 12
- Classics 23
- Medieval Iberian Studies 19
- Medieval Literature and History 5
- Co-authors
- Ralph J. Penny (1 shared paper)James Porter (1 shared paper)John M. Lipski (1 shared paper)Robert J. Blake (1 shared paper)Steven N. Dworkin (1 shared paper)Cynthia E. Irvine (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Hispanic Review (3 papers)Studies in Language (3 papers)The Modern Language Review (3 papers)Neophilologus (2 papers)Hispanic Research Journal (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Roger Wright
42 papers receiving 310 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Classics 165
- Linguistics and Language 165
- Language and Linguistics 379
- Music 21
- History 65
Countries citing papers authored by Roger Wright
This map shows the geographic impact of Roger Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roger Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roger Wright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Roger Wright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roger Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roger Wright. The network helps show where Roger Wright may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Roger Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 120 | |
| 2 | 1983 | 70 | |
| 3 | 1988 | 55 | |
| 4 | 1993 | 46 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 42 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 25 | |
| 7 | Asian music in North America | 1985 | 19 |
| 8 | 2013 | 19 | |
| 9 | 1997 | 14 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2001 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 14 | Late and Vulgar Latin in Muslim Spain: the African connection | 2012 | 8 |
| 15 | 2004 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2003 | 7 | |
| 17 | La composición de las actas del Concilio de Córdoba (839) | 2012 | 7 |
| 18 | 2006 | 7 | |
| 19 | 1976 | 6 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 6 |
About Roger Wright
Roger Wright is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Classics, Linguistics and Language, Archeology and History, having authored 64 papers that have together received 555 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies (21 papers), Medieval Iberian Studies (19 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (15 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (12 papers), Medieval European Literature and History (12 papers), Archaeological and Historical Studies (7 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (6 papers) and Medieval Literature and History (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (165 citations), Linguistics and Language (165 citations), Language and Linguistics (379 citations), Music (21 citations) and History (65 citations). Roger Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ralph J. Penny, James Porter, John M. Lipski, Robert J. Blake, Steven N. Dworkin and Cynthia E. Irvine. Their work appears in journals such as Hispanic Review, Studies in Language, The Modern Language Review, Neophilologus and Hispanic Research Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.