Robin M. Wright

41 papers receiving 255 citations

Peers

Robin M. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Anthropology 130
  • Archeology 12
  • Geography, Planning and Development 36
  • History 49
  • Cultural Studies 34
Replace Christine Hugh-Jones with:
Christine Hugh-Jones United Kingdom
Anne Christine Taylor Morocco
Tânia Stolze Lima Brazil
Curtis M. Hinsley United States
Harry Walker United Kingdom
Michael A. Uzendoski United States
Susan Carol Rogers United States
Marjorie Mandelstam Balzer United States
Eduardo Batalha Viveiros de Castro Brazil
Paul Henley Austria
Robin M. Wright relative to Christine Hugh-Jones United Kingdom Christine Hugh-Jones's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Christine Hugh-Jones · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robin M. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robin M. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robin M. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robin M. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robin M. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robin M. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robin M. Wright. The network helps show where Robin M. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robin M. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robin M. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Robin M. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200042
2 200138
3 201333
4 198630
5 198318
6
HISTORIA INDIGENA E DO INDIGENISMO NO ALTO RIO NEGRO
200515
7 199914
8 201213
9 200913
10 201611
11 199210
12 20049
13 20098
14
Indian slavery in the northwest amazon
19918
15 20176
16 20066
17 19966
18 20045
19 20095
20 20154

About Robin M. Wright

Robin M. Wright is a scholar working on Anthropology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, History and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 50 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anthropological Studies and Insights (20 papers), Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory (7 papers), Indigenous Health and Education (6 papers), Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (4 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (3 papers), Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (3 papers), Indigenous Studies in Latin America (3 papers) and Colonialism, slavery, and trade (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (130 citations), Archeology (12 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (36 citations), History (49 citations) and Cultural Studies (34 citations). Robin M. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Luíza Garnelo, Jonathan D. Hill, Fariba Adelkhah, L. Carl Brown, Neil L. Whitehead, Manuela Carneiro da Cunha, Bron Taylor, Augustus Richard Norton, Giampaolo Perri and Ernesto Sparrelid. Their work appears in journals such as Journal for the Study of Religion Nature and Culture, Ethnohistory, History of Religions, Anthropology & Humanism and Cadernos de Saúde Pública.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact