Robert‐Jan Schipper

42 papers receiving 881 citations

Peers

Robert‐Jan Schipper
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Cancer Research 674
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 490
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 323
  • Oncology 222
  • Surgery 300
Replace Melissa Pilewskie with:
Melissa Pilewskie United States
Raquel F. D. van la Parra Netherlands
Anita Mamtani United States
Janine M. Simons Netherlands
Antonio Esgueva Spain
Christopher Salud United States
Emilia Dauway United States
M. Moossdorff Netherlands
Monique Cohen France
Barbara Fowble United States
Robert‐Jan Schipper relative to Melissa Pilewskie United States Melissa Pilewskie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Melissa Pilewskie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert‐Jan Schipper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert‐Jan Schipper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert‐Jan Schipper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert‐Jan Schipper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert‐Jan Schipper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert‐Jan Schipper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert‐Jan Schipper. The network helps show where Robert‐Jan Schipper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert‐Jan Schipper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert‐Jan Schipper Line = papers co-authored together Robert‐Jan Schipper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013153
2 201580
3 201366
4 199554
5 201753
6 201451
7 201549
8 201941
9 201439
10 201438
11 201229
12 201829
13 201322
14 201421
15 201817
16 201916
17 201813
18 202012
19 201912
20 201712

About Robert‐Jan Schipper

Robert‐Jan Schipper is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Oncology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 45 papers that have together received 894 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (36 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (28 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (13 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (10 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (6 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (5 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (4 papers) and Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (674 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (490 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (323 citations), Oncology (222 citations) and Surgery (300 citations). Robert‐Jan Schipper has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Marjolein L. Smidt, Marc B. I. Lobbes, Geerard L. Beets, Grard A. P. Nieuwenhuijzen, Vivianne C. G. Tjan‐Heijnen, Joachim E. Wildberger, M. Moossdorff, Esther M. Heuts, Bart de Vries and Guusje Vugts. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Surgical Oncology, The Breast, Annals of Surgical Oncology, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment and Insights into Imaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact