Roberta Scotti

867 citations
13 papers · 561 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Roberta Scotti

12 papers receiving 556 citations

Peers

Roberta Scotti
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 289
  • Neurology 112
  • Rheumatology 56
  • Ophthalmology 29
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 59
Replace Laura Cacciaguerra with:
Laura Cacciaguerra Italy
Monica Margoni Italy
Patricia Roche United States
Lívia Sousa Portugal
Giulia Longoni Canada
Caterina Lapucci Italy
Katrin Weier Switzerland
Chandrajit Prasad India
Johnny P.A. Samijn Netherlands
Signe Modvig Denmark
Roberta Scotti relative to Laura Cacciaguerra Italy Laura Cacciaguerra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×35×
Laura Cacciaguerra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roberta Scotti

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roberta Scotti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roberta Scotti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roberta Scotti more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roberta Scotti

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roberta Scotti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roberta Scotti. The network helps show where Roberta Scotti may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Roberta Scotti, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roberta Scotti Line = papers co-authored together Roberta Scotti links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2018172
2 2020127
3 201787
4 201447
5 200946
6 202117
7 202017
8 201415
9 202014
10 200612
11 20066
12 20091
13 20150

About Roberta Scotti

Roberta Scotti is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 13 papers that have together received 561 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (4 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (2 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (2 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (2 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers) and Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (289 citations), Neurology (112 citations), Rheumatology (56 citations), Ophthalmology (29 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (59 citations). Roberta Scotti has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Vittorio Martinelli, Massimo Filippi, Martina Absinta, Pascal Sati, Nicoletta Anzalone, Pietro Maggi, Gaetano Perrotta, Luisa Vuolo, Govind Nair and Bryan Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Neurology, Frontiers in Pediatrics, Neurology, Brain Structure and Function and Brain and Cognition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact