Robert Tropek
Impact in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Ecological Modeling top 2%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
Papers in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 47
-
- Plant and animal studies 39
- Co-authors
- Martin Konvička (10 shared papers)Lukáš Spitzer (7 shared papers)Tomáš Kadlec (7 shared papers)Petr Kočárek (5 shared papers)Filip Tichánek (9 shared papers)Martin Hejda (7 shared papers)Štěpán Janeček (26 shared papers)Ivan Hadrián Tuf (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- ZooKeys (7 papers)Ecological Engineering (5 papers)Journal of Insect Conservation (5 papers)Biological Conservation (3 papers)Scientific Reports (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- CzechiaUnited StatesCameroon
In The Last Decade
Robert Tropek
73 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 875
- Ecological Modeling 255
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 804
- Insect Science 426
- Ecology 577
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Tropek
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Tropek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Tropek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Tropek more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Tropek
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Tropek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Tropek. The network helps show where Robert Tropek may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Tropek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 236 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 128 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 124 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 118 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 65 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 60 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 60 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 54 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 54 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 51 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 50 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 48 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 46 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 39 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 35 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 31 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 31 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 28 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 27 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 24 |
About Robert Tropek
Robert Tropek is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Insect Science and Genetics, having authored 77 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (47 papers), Plant and animal studies (39 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (19 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (16 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (16 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (13 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (9 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (875 citations), Ecological Modeling (255 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (804 citations), Insect Science (426 citations) and Ecology (577 citations). Robert Tropek has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, United States and Cameroon. Frequent co-authors include Martin Konvička, Lukáš Spitzer, Tomáš Kadlec, Petr Kočárek, Filip Tichánek, Martin Hejda, Štěpán Janeček, Ivan Hadrián Tuf, Igor Malenovský and Petr Baňař. Their work appears in journals such as ZooKeys, Ecological Engineering, Journal of Insect Conservation, Biological Conservation and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.