Robert Stokes

46 papers receiving 602 citations

Peers

Robert Stokes
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Biophysics 31
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 7
  • Toxicology 14
  • Sociology and Political Science 189
  • Health 30
Replace Susan Molyneux‐Hodgson with:
Susan Molyneux‐Hodgson United Kingdom
Brian Pink United States
Joe Alper United States
Rong Hu China
Hongliang Chen China
Nicola Bellini Italy
Eva Andersson Sweden
Hallam Stevens Singapore
Zakir Husain India
Robert Chambers United States
Robert Stokes relative to Susan Molyneux‐Hodgson United Kingdom Susan Molyneux‐Hodgson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×
Susan Molyneux‐Hodgson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Stokes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Stokes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Stokes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Stokes. The network helps show where Robert Stokes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Stokes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Stokes Line = papers co-authored together Robert Stokes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000111
2 201078
3 201278
4 202034
5 200529
6 200127
7 200926
8 196724
9 200922
10 200219
11 200818
12 200816
13 200916
14 201215
15 202310
16 200510
17 20239
18 20199
19
Up the creek: what is wrong with the definition of a river in New South Wales?
20058
20
That sinking feeling : a legal assessment of the coastal planning system in New South Wales
20118

About Robert Stokes

Robert Stokes is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Sociology and Political Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Molecular Biology and Ecology, having authored 53 papers that have together received 664 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (4 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (4 papers), Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications (4 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (3 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (3 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (3 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (3 papers) and Archaeology and Natural History (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (31 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (7 citations), Toxicology (14 citations), Sociology and Political Science (189 citations) and Health (30 citations). Robert Stokes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Wayne N. Welsh, Jack R. Greene, Duncan Graham, Mark Patrick Taylor, John A. Hunt, Raymond G. Sanedrin, Judith M. Curran, George L. Maddox, Nabil A. Amro and H Jamil. Their work appears in journals such as Security Journal, Biochemical Society Transactions, Journal of Forensic Sciences, Journal of Urbanism International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability and Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact