Robert Speck

634 citations
33 papers · 373 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Speck

30 papers receiving 361 citations

Peers

Robert Speck
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Numerical Analysis 146
  • Computational Mechanics 196
  • Hardware and Architecture 46
  • Computational Mathematics 3
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 84
Replace Daniel Ruprecht with:
Daniel Ruprecht Germany
Matthew Emmett United States
Hengbin An China
Benjamin Ong United States
Valérie Frayssé France
Christopher Siefert United States
Michel Méhrenberger France
Willi Schönauer Germany
Christian Glusa United States
Kjell Gustafsson Sweden
Robert Speck relative to Daniel Ruprecht Germany Daniel Ruprecht's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Daniel Ruprecht · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Speck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Speck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Speck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Speck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Speck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Speck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Speck. The network helps show where Robert Speck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Robert Speck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Speck Line = papers co-authored together Robert Speck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201155
2 201446
3 201534
4 201229
5 201226
6 201420
7 201718
8 201518
9 201618
10 201018
11 201411
12 20189
13 20169
14 20197
15 20237
16 20117
17 20105
18
Twelve Ways To Fool The Masses When Giving Parallel-In-Time Results.
20215
19 20235
20 20144

About Robert Speck

Robert Speck is a scholar working on Numerical Analysis, Computational Mechanics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 33 papers that have together received 373 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Numerical methods for differential equations (16 papers), Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics (13 papers), Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods (9 papers), Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (7 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (7 papers), Scientific Research and Discoveries (4 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (4 papers) and Algorithms and Data Compression (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (146 citations), Computational Mechanics (196 citations), Hardware and Architecture (46 citations), Computational Mathematics (3 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (84 citations). Robert Speck has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Ruprecht, Rolf Krause, Matthew Emmett, Michael L. Minion, P. Gibbon, Matthias Bolten, Lukas Arnold, Martin Frank, Martin J. Gander and Anupam Karmakar. Their work appears in journals such as Lecture notes in computational science and engineering, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, Computer Physics Communications, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science and Computing and Visualization in Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact