Robert Snape

439 citations
29 papers · 191 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Snape

26 papers receiving 161 citations

Peers

Robert Snape
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Library and Information Sciences 16
  • Urban Studies 23
  • Social Psychology 60
  • Sociology and Political Science 103
  • Gender Studies 22
Replace Michael O’Brien with:
Michael O’Brien United States
Leela Bakshi India
Henning Bech Denmark
Ronald J. Grele United States
Michael Renov United States
Jill Julius Matthews Australia
Sabine Frühstück United States
Anita Clair Fellman United States
David Seitz United States
Francis A. Pearman United States
Robert Snape relative to Michael O’Brien United States Michael O’Brien's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Michael O’Brien · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Snape

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Snape's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Snape with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Snape more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Snape

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Snape. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Snape. The network helps show where Robert Snape may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Robert Snape, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Snape Line = papers co-authored together Robert Snape links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201620
2 200819
3 201718
4 201117
5 200415
6
Leisure and the rise of the public library
199515
7 199210
8 20029
9 20198
10 20148
11 19757
12 20196
13 20136
14
Recording leisure lives: histories, archives and memories of leisure in 20th century Britain.
20096
15
Studies in international economics : Monash conference papers
19704
16 20054
17 20163
18 20093
19
International trade and the Australian economy
19733
20 20212

About Robert Snape

Robert Snape is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Urban Studies, History and Physiology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 191 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (9 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (9 papers), Religious Tourism and Spaces (3 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (3 papers), Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research (2 papers), Library Science and Administration (2 papers), Data Analysis and Archiving (2 papers) and Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (16 citations), Urban Studies (23 citations), Social Psychology (60 citations), Sociology and Political Science (103 citations) and Gender Studies (22 citations). Robert Snape has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jerome Carson, Thomas Fletcher, Sandro Carnicelli, John Haworth, Louise Platt and Karl Spracklen. Their work appears in journals such as Leisure Studies, World Leisure Journal, Journal of International Economics, Journal of Victorian Culture and The International Journal of the History of Sport.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact