Robert Shaver

1.3k citations
73 papers · 792 · h-index 14

Impact in

    • Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Philosophy top 2%
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory

Papers in

Robert Shaver

65 papers receiving 646 citations

Peers

Robert Shaver
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Paleontology 188
  • Philosophy 177
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 192
  • Earth-Surface Processes 70
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 127
Replace Maël Lemoine with:
Maël Lemoine France
J. D. Lewis‐Williams South Africa
Peter Hoare United Kingdom
David Saldaña Spain
Robert L. King United States
Stephen J. Reynolds United States
John Howland Rowe United States
Chris Carey United Kingdom
Elizabeth Graham United Kingdom
Michel Petit France
Robert Shaver relative to Maël Lemoine France Maël Lemoine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Maël Lemoine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Shaver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Shaver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Shaver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Shaver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Shaver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Shaver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Shaver. The network helps show where Robert Shaver may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Shaver, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Shaver Line = papers co-authored together Robert Shaver links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199275
2 198566
3 199662
4 198461
5 198552
6 199651
7 200036
8 199523
9 198920
10 197417
11 200415
12
Compendium of Rock-Unit Stratigraphy in Indiana
197014
13 201413
14 197813
15 197513
16
Early Pennsylvanian fusulinids and ostracods of the Illinois Basin [Illinois-Kentucky]
195911
17 199011
18 197711
19 199711
20 200610

About Robert Shaver

Robert Shaver is a scholar working on Philosophy, Paleontology, Political Science and International Relations, Cognitive Neuroscience and Earth-Surface Processes, having authored 73 papers that have together received 792 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (17 papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (11 papers), Geological formations and processes (10 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (9 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (6 papers), Free Will and Agency (6 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers) and Geological Studies and Exploration (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (188 citations), Philosophy (177 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (192 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (70 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (127 citations). Robert Shaver has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Timothy G. Dinan, Gary Aston‐Jones, Gerald Gaus, Donald E. Moss, Joseph Rogers, Richard M. Corfield, Jiří Kříž, Dimitri Kaljo, Tiiu Märss and V Viira. Their work appears in journals such as Utilitas, The Philosophical Review, Philosophical Studies, Journal of Paleontology and AAPG Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact