Robert Schertzer

588 citations
20 papers · 285 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Schertzer

17 papers receiving 268 citations

Peers

Robert Schertzer
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Political Science and International Relations 133
  • Sociology and Political Science 152
  • Modeling and Simulation 16
  • Communication 23
  • Public Administration 9
Replace Bastian A. Vollmer with:
Bastian A. Vollmer United Kingdom
Andrea Pedrazzani Italy
Anne McNevin Australia
Bi Puranen Sweden
Éric Kerrouche France
Conrad Ziller Germany
Insa Koch United Kingdom
Jan-Paul Brekke Norway
Shayla C. Nunnally United States
Raùl Magni-Berton France
Robert Schertzer relative to Bastian A. Vollmer United Kingdom Bastian A. Vollmer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Bastian A. Vollmer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Schertzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Schertzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Schertzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Schertzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Schertzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Schertzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Schertzer. The network helps show where Robert Schertzer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Robert Schertzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Schertzer Line = papers co-authored together Robert Schertzer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2020116
2 202055
3 202035
4 201516
5 201613
6 201912
7 20118
8 20227
9 20185
10 20114
11 20173
12
How nationalism can be a force for good in the struggle against Covid-19
20203
13 20232
14 20082
15 20162
16 20181
17 20221
18 20170
19 20250
20 20250

About Robert Schertzer

Robert Schertzer is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Law, Gender Studies and Communication, having authored 20 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Systems and Governance (7 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (4 papers), Canadian Policy and Governance (3 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (3 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (3 papers), Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (2 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (2 papers) and Canadian Identity and History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (133 citations), Sociology and Political Science (152 citations), Modeling and Simulation (16 citations), Communication (23 citations) and Public Administration (9 citations). Robert Schertzer has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Eric Taylor Woods, Mireille Paquet, Cynthia Miller‐Idriss, Liah Greenfeld, Grace Skogstad, Eric Kaufmann and Catherine Ouellet. Their work appears in journals such as Nations and Nationalism, Canadian Journal of Political Science, Publius The Journal of Federalism, Commonwealth and Comparative Politics and Modern Law Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact