Robert S. Boynton

836 citations
6 papers · 600 · 1 hit paper · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

Journals
Medical Entomology and Zoology (2 papers)The English Journal (1 paper)

In The Last Decade

Robert S. Boynton

6 papers receiving 510 citations

Robert S. Boynton's Hit Papers

Chemistry and Technology of Lime and Limestone 1966 · 562 citations
5620+20+40Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

Robert S. Boynton
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Earth-Surface Processes 203
  • Conservation 90
  • Archeology 124
  • Archeology 8
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 138
Replace M. Vendrell with:
M. Vendrell Spain
Sabrina Gualtieri Italy
A. Luque Spain
Sabina Kramar Slovenia
João Coroado Portugal
Silvia Rescic Italy
Ceren Ince Türkiye
Natalia Rovella Italy
Emma Cantisani Italy
Luciana Randazzo Italy
Robert S. Boynton relative to M. Vendrell Spain M. Vendrell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
M. Vendrell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert S. Boynton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert S. Boynton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert S. Boynton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert S. Boynton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert S. Boynton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert S. Boynton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert S. Boynton. The network helps show where Robert S. Boynton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Robert S. Boynton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert S. Boynton Line = papers co-authored together Robert S. Boynton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1
Chemistry and Technology of Lime and Limestone
Hit paper breakdown →
1966562
2
The New New Journalism: Conversations with America's Best Nonfiction Writers on Their Craft
200532
3
The Invitation-Only Zone: The True Story of North Korea's Abduction Project
20162
4 19892
5
Checkbook Journalism Revisited
20081
6
Chemistry and technology of lime and limestone / Robert S. Boynton
19801

About Robert S. Boynton

Robert S. Boynton is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Mechanical Engineering, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 6 papers that have together received 600 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American and British Literature Analysis (1 paper), Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (1 paper), Mining and Gasification Technologies (1 paper) and Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Earth-Surface Processes (203 citations), Conservation (90 citations), Archeology (124 citations), Archeology (8 citations) and Civil and Structural Engineering (138 citations). Frequent co-authors include James R. Squire and Hans P. Guth. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Entomology and Zoology and The English Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact