Robert Pinker

788 citations
41 papers · 294 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Pinker

33 papers receiving 222 citations

Peers

Robert Pinker
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Public Administration 28
  • Political Science and International Relations 133
  • Finance 48
  • History 34
  • General Health Professions 63
Replace Joanne L. Goodwin with:
Joanne L. Goodwin United States
Vic George United Kingdom
John W. Offer United Kingdom
Barbara Schmitter Heisler United States
Patricia Thane United Kingdom
Shelley A. M. Gavigan Canada
Víctor Miguel Pérez Díaz Spain
Sue Penna United Kingdom
Diana M. Pearce United States
Jonathan Guy Allen United States
Robert Pinker relative to Joanne L. Goodwin United States Joanne L. Goodwin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Joanne L. Goodwin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Pinker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Pinker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Pinker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Pinker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Pinker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Pinker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Pinker. The network helps show where Robert Pinker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Robert Pinker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Pinker Line = papers co-authored together Robert Pinker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
English Hospital Statistics, 1861-1938
196653
2 198044
3 196926
4 199224
5 201720
6 197419
7 200616
8 201716
9
Social Work in an Enterprise Society
199114
10 19857
11 19687
12 20225
13 20185
14 19844
15 20183
16 19683
17 19953
18 19922
19 19802
20
Social policy and welfare pluralism : selected writings of Robert Pinker
20172

About Robert Pinker

Robert Pinker is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Finance, Public Administration, History and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 41 papers that have together received 294 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Policy and Reform Studies (14 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (5 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (3 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (3 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (3 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (3 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (3 papers) and Social Issues and Policies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (28 citations), Political Science and International Relations (133 citations), Finance (48 citations), History (34 citations) and General Health Professions (63 citations). Robert Pinker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Donald G. MacRae, Ray Jones, William Taylor, John W. Offer, W. A. C. Stewart, Michael D. Young and Robert M. J. Deacon. Their work appears in journals such as Social Policy and Administration, British Journal of Sociology, British Journal of Educational Studies, The Gerontologist and Journal of Social Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact