Robert Kung
Impact in
- Hepatology top 2%
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
- Liver Disease and Transplantation
- Oncology top 10%
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Papers in
- Surgery 5
- Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes 2
- Esophageal and GI Pathology 1
-
- Biliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas 1
- Co-authors
- Alan J. Koffron (3 shared papers)Michaël Abécassis (3 shared papers)Lori Clark (1 shared paper)Jonathan P. Fryer (1 shared paper)Talia Baker (1 shared paper)Gregory B. Auffenberg (1 shared paper)Qiang Cai (2 shared papers)Viraj A. Master (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Gastroenterology (1 paper)The American Journal of Medicine (1 paper)Endoscopy (1 paper)American Journal of Transplantation (1 paper)Surgery (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
Robert Kung
7 papers receiving 573 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Hepatology 489
- Oncology 265
- Surgery 417
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 166
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 68
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Kung
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Kung's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Kung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Kung more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Kung
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Kung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Kung. The network helps show where Robert Kung may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Robert Kung, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 376 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 135 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 65 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 1 |
About Robert Kung
Robert Kung is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Hepatology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 7 papers that have together received 587 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (2 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (2 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (2 papers), Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases (1 paper), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare (1 paper), Esophageal and GI Pathology (1 paper), Cardiac tumors and thrombi (1 paper) and Biliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (489 citations), Oncology (265 citations), Surgery (417 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (166 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (68 citations). Robert Kung has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Alan J. Koffron, Michaël Abécassis, Lori Clark, Jonathan P. Fryer, Talia Baker, Gregory B. Auffenberg, Qiang Cai, Viraj A. Master, Jason Brown and Stephen D. Clements. Their work appears in journals such as Gastroenterology, The American Journal of Medicine, Endoscopy, American Journal of Transplantation and Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.