Robert Keil

4.2k citations
82 papers · 3.2k · h-index 32

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Keil

79 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Robert Keil
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 245
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 2k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 498
  • Artificial Intelligence 770
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 211
Replace Andrea Crespi with:
Andrea Crespi Italy
P. Di Trapani Italy
Felix Dreisow Germany
Yaakov Lumer Israel
Hakan E. Türeci United States
Ottavia Jedrkiewicz Italy
Luis Lorenzo Sánchez-Soto Spain
Sonja Franke‐Arnold United Kingdom
Alfredo De Rossi France
Ray‐Kuang Lee Taiwan
Robert Keil relative to Andrea Crespi Italy Andrea Crespi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Andrea Crespi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Keil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Keil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Keil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Keil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Keil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Keil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Keil. The network helps show where Robert Keil may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Keil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Keil Line = papers co-authored together Robert Keil links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013208
2 2010190
3 2018154
4 2011148
5 2013146
6 2014124
7 2014121
8 2016111
9 2009109
10 201796
11 201692
12 201081
13 201179
14 201077
15 201270
16 201369
17 201168
18 201967
19 201166
20 201266

About Robert Keil

Robert Keil is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Acoustics and Ultrasonics, Artificial Intelligence and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 82 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonlinear Photonic Systems (20 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (20 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (13 papers), Random lasers and scattering media (13 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics (10 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (9 papers), Quantum optics and atomic interactions (9 papers) and Topological Materials and Phenomena (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Acoustics and Ultrasonics (245 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (2k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (498 citations), Artificial Intelligence (770 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (211 citations). Robert Keil has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Israel and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Szameit, Stefan Nolte, Felix Dreisow, Matthias Heinrich, Andreas Tünnermann, Demetrios N. Christodoulides, Armando Pérez-Leija, Oliver G. Schmidt, Fei Ding and Michael Zopf. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Optics Letters, Physical Review A, Applied Physics Letters and Nature Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact