Robert K. DeMott

550 citations
19 papers · 325 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Robert K. DeMott

19 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers

Robert K. DeMott
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 127
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 56
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 45
  • Surgery 90
  • Emergency Medical Services 11
Replace Maki Murakami with:
Maki Murakami Japan
Burkhard Fischer Germany
Herbert F. Sandmire United States
B. P. Sachs United States
G Russell United Kingdom
Saima Siddiqui Pakistan
Thomas Ivester United States
Mary T. Nabukenya Uganda
M Palot France
David N. Soule United States
Robert K. DeMott relative to Maki Murakami Japan Maki Murakami's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Maki Murakami · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert K. DeMott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert K. DeMott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert K. DeMott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert K. DeMott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert K. DeMott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert K. DeMott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert K. DeMott. The network helps show where Robert K. DeMott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Robert K. DeMott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert K. DeMott Line = papers co-authored together Robert K. DeMott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 199057
2 199443
3 200037
4 199636
5 200224
6 199224
7 200220
8 197819
9 197914
10 199413
11 200810
12 20088
13
Auscultation of the fetal heart presents advantages over electronic monitoring.
19956
14 19806
15 20032
16 20002
17 20002
18 20001
19
Erb's palsy causation: iatrogenic or resulting from labor forces?
20051

About Robert K. DeMott

Robert K. DeMott is a scholar working on Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 19 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (6 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (4 papers), Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy (3 papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (2 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (2 papers), Effects of Radiation Exposure (2 papers), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (2 papers) and Child and Adolescent Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (127 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (56 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (45 citations), Surgery (90 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (11 citations). Robert K. DeMott has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Herbert F. Sandmire, Ríona Mulcahy, Kelly H. Clifton and Michael N. Gould. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Birth and Experimental Biology and Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact