Robert Goodwin

64 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Robert Goodwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 329
  • Information Systems and Management 163
  • Biomedical Engineering 731
  • Filtration and Separation 32
  • Organic Chemistry 379
Replace H. L. Armstrong with:
H. L. Armstrong Canada
Ronald W. Rousseau United States
Leif Laaksonen Finland
Donald T. Hawkins United States
William Young Australia
Peter Schofield United Kingdom
Robert S. Hansen United States
Katherine J. Strandburg United States
Lewis M. Branscomb United States
Donald P. Visco United States
Robert Goodwin relative to H. L. Armstrong Canada H. L. Armstrong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
H. L. Armstrong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Goodwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Goodwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Goodwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Goodwin. The network helps show where Robert Goodwin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Robert Goodwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Goodwin Line = papers co-authored together Robert Goodwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988167
2 1987141
3 1989109
4 201168
5 198565
6 201365
7 197265
8
Factors Influencing Citizen Adoption of SMS-based e-Government Services
201056
9 197252
10 196343
11 196439
12 201536
13 196935
14 196335
15 196135
16 197334
17 196929
18 196129
19 196925
20 196324

About Robert Goodwin

Robert Goodwin is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Political Science and International Relations, Organic Chemistry, Information Systems and Management and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 71 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (21 papers), E-Government and Public Services (12 papers), Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (11 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (11 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (9 papers), Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies (7 papers), Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (5 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (329 citations), Information Systems and Management (163 citations), Biomedical Engineering (731 citations), Filtration and Separation (32 citations) and Organic Chemistry (379 citations). Robert Goodwin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Tony Dwi Susanto, H. M. Roder, Dwain E. Diller, Lloyd A. Weber, Giselle Rampersad, L. A. Weber, G. C. Straty, Carl Mooney, Ahmed Al-Hunaiyyan and Paul Calder. Their work appears in journals such as Cryogenics, Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, Review of Scientific Instruments, Analytical Chemistry and Government Information Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact