Robert G. Kleva

1.6k citations
62 papers · 1.3k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Robert G. Kleva

61 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Robert G. Kleva
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.1k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.1k
  • Condensed Matter Physics 124
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 92
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 136
Replace J. W. Van Dam with:
J. W. Van Dam United States
O. P. Pogutse United Kingdom
N. H. Bian United Kingdom
A. Zeiler Germany
R. Horiuchi Japan
John Wesson United Kingdom
M. Pekker United States
F. L. Waelbroeck United States
A. Rogister Germany
T. J. Schep Netherlands
Robert G. Kleva relative to J. W. Van Dam United States J. W. Van Dam's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
J. W. Van Dam · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert G. Kleva

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert G. Kleva's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert G. Kleva with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert G. Kleva more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert G. Kleva

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert G. Kleva. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert G. Kleva. The network helps show where Robert G. Kleva may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert G. Kleva, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert G. Kleva Line = papers co-authored together Robert G. Kleva links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1983176
2 1994138
3 1995133
4 199183
5 200175
6 200160
7 198456
8 200152
9 198643
10 197938
11 199436
12 199136
13 200225
14 198722
15 200121
16 200817
17 200417
18 198816
19 198716
20 200116

About Robert G. Kleva

Robert G. Kleva is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (54 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (44 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (18 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (9 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (9 papers), Dust and Plasma Wave Phenomena (6 papers), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (5 papers) and Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.1k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.1k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (124 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (92 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (136 citations). Robert G. Kleva has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include J. F. Drake, P. N. Guzdar, John A. Krommes, C. Oberman, P. K. Kaw, M. E. Mandt, F. L. Waelbroeck, Amita Das, P. N. Guzdar and R. E. Denton. Their work appears in journals such as Physics of Plasmas, Physical Review Letters, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, The Astrophysical Journal and Journal of Plasma Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact