Robert G. Bourne

25 papers receiving 577 citations

Peers

Robert G. Bourne
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Oncology 366
  • Aerospace Engineering 212
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 55
  • Dermatology 53
  • Epidemiology 160
Replace Graeme Dickie with:
Graeme Dickie Australia
Russell Gollard United States
Anuj V. Peddada United States
Chris Hamilton Australia
Stephen J. Schultenover United States
Robert S. Planner Australia
Luis G. Gómez United States
Arnoldus S. Pieterse Australia
M Di Muzio Italy
Elizabeth Rumball New Zealand
Robert G. Bourne relative to Graeme Dickie Australia Graeme Dickie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Graeme Dickie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert G. Bourne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert G. Bourne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert G. Bourne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert G. Bourne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert G. Bourne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert G. Bourne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert G. Bourne. The network helps show where Robert G. Bourne may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Robert G. Bourne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert G. Bourne Line = papers co-authored together Robert G. Bourne links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995196
2 1983100
3
Paired cervical smears: a method of reducing the false-negative rate in population screening.
198252
4 198850
5 198045
6 196335
7 198330
8 199124
9 198713
10 197610
11 20008
12 19687
13 19886
14 19896
15 19955
16
Hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc) versus placebo: Cochrane Review 2005
20053
17 19613
18 19632
19 19912
20 20032

About Robert G. Bourne

Robert G. Bourne is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Surgery and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 608 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (5 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (4 papers), Antenna Design and Analysis (3 papers), Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (3 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (3 papers), Full-Duplex Wireless Communications (3 papers), Effects of Radiation Exposure (2 papers) and Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (366 citations), Aerospace Engineering (212 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (55 citations), Dermatology (53 citations) and Epidemiology (160 citations). Robert G. Bourne has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Russia and United States. Frequent co-authors include John H. Kearsley, Michael G. E. OʼRourke, J. O. W. Beilby, J Guillebaud, Gordon Wright, Brian T. Hill, Graeme Dickie, Bruce G. Ward, T. J. Harris and A.F. Burry. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Radiology, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact