Robert Frater

545 citations
16 papers · 390 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Frater

15 papers receiving 350 citations

Peers

Robert Frater
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 256
  • Surgery 132
  • Epidemiology 93
  • Genetics 28
  • Emergency Medicine 21
Replace Hooshang Soltanzadeh with:
Hooshang Soltanzadeh United States
C Cabrol France
Tjalling W. Waterbolk Netherlands
Roland Hénaine France
Chang‐Ha Lee South Korea
Andrew S. Olearchyk United States
Shuji Fukunaga Japan
Uberto Bortolotti Italy
Sami S. Kabbani Syria
Neal D. Hillman United States
Robert Frater relative to Hooshang Soltanzadeh United States Hooshang Soltanzadeh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Hooshang Soltanzadeh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Frater

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Frater's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Frater with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Frater more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Frater

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Frater. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Frater. The network helps show where Robert Frater may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Frater, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Frater Line = papers co-authored together Robert Frater links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 200289
2 198066
3 199265
4 199139
5 196832
6 198920
7 198515
8 197912
9 198712
10
Functional anatomy of the normal mitral apparatus: a transthoracic, two-dimensional echocardiographic study.
200311
11 198311
12 19936
13 19734
14 20034
15
Late sequelae of prematurity.
19653
16 19651

About Robert Frater

Robert Frater is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology and Genetics, having authored 16 papers that have together received 390 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (9 papers), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (3 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (2 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (2 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (2 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (1 paper) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (256 citations), Surgery (132 citations), Epidemiology (93 citations), Genetics (28 citations) and Emergency Medicine (21 citations). Robert Frater has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Endre Bodnar, Alan T. Marty, James D. Thomas, Eugene H. Blackstone, Michael K. Banbury, Delos M. Cosgrove, J. Edward Okies, Jeevanantham Rajeswaran, S M Factor and E Seifter. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact