Robert Eccleshall

912 citations
13 papers · 391 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Eccleshall

12 papers receiving 304 citations

Peers

Robert Eccleshall
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Political Science and International Relations 183
  • Communication 28
  • Sociology and Political Science 174
  • Philosophy 37
  • Public Administration 11
Replace Leonardo Salamini with:
Leonardo Salamini United States
Vincent C. Hopkins Canada
Lawrence A. Scaff United States
Arthur A. Ekirch United States
Renate Holub United States
John B. Judis
David Plotke United States
Gillis J. Harp United States
David Ames Curtis United Kingdom
Peter C. Sederberg United States
Robert Eccleshall relative to Leonardo Salamini United States Leonardo Salamini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Leonardo Salamini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Eccleshall

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Eccleshall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Eccleshall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Eccleshall more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Eccleshall

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Eccleshall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Eccleshall. The network helps show where Robert Eccleshall may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Robert Eccleshall, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Eccleshall Line = papers co-authored together Robert Eccleshall links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1986311
2 197921
3 200012
4
British liberalism : liberal thought from the 1640s to 1980s
19868
5 19848
6
Political Ideologies: An Introduction (3rd edition)
20037
7
English Conservatism Since the Restoration: An Introduction and Anthology
20025
8 19795
9 19864
10 19773
11 20013
12 20022
13 20022

About Robert Eccleshall

Robert Eccleshall is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, History, Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry and Surgery, having authored 13 papers that have together received 391 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Studies of British Isles (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper) and Political and Economic history of UK and US (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (183 citations), Communication (28 citations), Sociology and Political Science (174 citations), Philosophy (37 citations) and Public Administration (11 citations). Robert Eccleshall has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Richard Schlatter, Vincent Geoghegan, D. George Boyce, Moya Lloyd, Michael Kenny, Alan Finlayson and Rick Wilford. Their work appears in journals such as Political Studies, Politics & Society, The American Historical Review, Journal of Political Ideologies and Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact