Robert E. Tooms

15 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Robert E. Tooms
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Biochemistry 651
  • Rehabilitation 150
  • Occupational Therapy 133
  • Developmental Biology 21
  • Surgery 230
Replace WILLIAM K. PRUSACZYK with:
WILLIAM K. PRUSACZYK United States
Patarawan Woratanarat Thailand
Sven Byström Sweden
Andrew J. Kittelson United States
Armand Cholewka Poland
Kazuya Hirose Japan
Dante Medici Italy
H.-H. Dickhuth Germany
João Páscoa Pinheiro Portugal
Makio Yamaga Japan
Robert E. Tooms relative to WILLIAM K. PRUSACZYK United States WILLIAM K. PRUSACZYK's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.2×
WILLIAM K. PRUSACZYK · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Tooms

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Tooms's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Tooms with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Tooms more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Tooms

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Tooms. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Tooms. The network helps show where Robert E. Tooms may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Robert E. Tooms, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert E. Tooms Line = papers co-authored together Robert E. Tooms links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 1999811
2 1991123
3
Seated lumbar/pelvic alignment. A comparison between spinal cord-injured and noninjured groups.
199280
4 199265
5
Eccentric muscle performance of elbow and knee muscle groups in untrained men and women.
199356
6 199356
7 199441
8 198935
9 199335
10
Effect of viscoelastic insoles on pain.
198725
11 199121
12 199412
13 197211
14 199311
15
Closed injuries of the dorsal and dorsilumbar spine and cord.
19791

About Robert E. Tooms

Robert E. Tooms is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 15 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (4 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (3 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (2 papers), Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (2 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (2 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (2 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (2 papers) and Sports Performance and Training (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (651 citations), Rehabilitation (150 citations), Occupational Therapy (133 citations), Developmental Biology (21 citations) and Surgery (230 citations). Robert E. Tooms has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Benjamin E. Bierbaum, John J. Callaghan, Harry E. Rubash, Jorge O. Galante, Judy W. Griffin, Roger Vander Zwaag, Douglas Hobson, Faten El-Zeky, T. E. Bertoríni and Mary L. OʼToole. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Therapy, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Neuromuscular Disorders and Orthopedic Clinics of North America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact