Robert E. Asher

29 papers receiving 235 citations

Peers

Robert E. Asher
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Development 119
  • Public Administration 33
  • Finance 45
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 30
  • Political Science and International Relations 92
Replace Roger Tooze with:
Roger Tooze United Kingdom
Manfred Bienefeld United Kingdom
J. P. Nettl United Kingdom
Richard Jeffries United Kingdom
Edward Weisband United States
Karl de Schweinitz United States
George C. Abbott United Kingdom
David Clinton United States
Fikret Şenses Türkiye
Otto Kreye
Robert E. Asher relative to Roger Tooze United Kingdom Roger Tooze's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Roger Tooze · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Asher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Asher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Asher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Asher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Asher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Asher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Asher. The network helps show where Robert E. Asher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Robert E. Asher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert E. Asher Line = papers co-authored together Robert E. Asher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1974156
2
Edward S. Mason y Robert E. Asher. The world bank since bretton woods. Washington, D.C. : The Brookings Institution, 1973
197533
3 198718
4 199116
5 196916
6 197915
7 198210
8 19839
9 19639
10 19598
11 19737
12 19916
13 19916
14 19626
15
Workmen's compensation in the United States, 1880-1935
19826
16 19625
17 19965
18 19715
19 20144
20 19844

About Robert E. Asher

Robert E. Asher is a scholar working on Development, Public Administration, Marketing, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 38 papers that have together received 372 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Development and Aid (4 papers), Race, History, and American Society (4 papers), American History and Culture (3 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (3 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (2 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (2 papers) and Global Peace and Security Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (119 citations), Public Administration (33 citations), Finance (45 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (30 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (92 citations). Robert E. Asher has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Edward S. Mason, Theodore Morgan, Charles Stephenson, Kathleen M. Blee, Eric L. Hirsch, Dennis C. Dickerson, Theodore H. Cohn, Eileen B. Leonard, Linda Hart Lewis and Graham Russell Hodges. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, International Organization, The Journal of Finance, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and Labor History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact