Robert Darcy

975 citations
33 papers · 673 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Darcy

28 papers receiving 529 citations

Peers

Robert Darcy
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Gender Studies 307
  • Political Science and International Relations 352
  • General Decision Sciences 4
  • Human-Computer Interaction 8
  • Public Administration 6
Replace Jack Blumenau with:
Jack Blumenau United Kingdom
Cecilia Josefsson Sweden
Barbara Palmer United States
Jean‐François Godbout Canada
Sofía Collignon United Kingdom
Jens Olav Dahlgaard Denmark
William T. Daniel United States
Craig M. Burnett United States
Doris Allhutter Austria
Alexis Leanna Henshaw United States
Robert Darcy relative to Jack Blumenau United Kingdom Jack Blumenau's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11×
Jack Blumenau · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Darcy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Darcy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Darcy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Darcy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Darcy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Darcy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Darcy. The network helps show where Robert Darcy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Robert Darcy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Darcy Line = papers co-authored together Robert Darcy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1977131
2 198982
3 199076
4 198652
5 198644
6
Women, elections & representation
199440
7 198534
8 199034
9 199332
10 199222
11 199417
12 198916
13 199814
14 198810
15 19839
16 19939
17 19908
18 19807
19
A guide to quantitative history
19956
20 19966

About Robert Darcy

Robert Darcy is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Political Science and International Relations, Statistics and Probability, History and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 33 papers that have together received 673 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Politics and Representation (15 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (13 papers), Statistical Methods and Applications (4 papers), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (3 papers), Political Science Research and Education (3 papers), American Political and Social Dynamics (2 papers), Historical Geography and Cartography (1 paper) and Poetry Analysis and Criticism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (307 citations), Political Science and International Relations (352 citations), General Decision Sciences (4 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (8 citations) and Public Administration (6 citations). Robert Darcy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ian McAllister, Anne Larason Schneider, Susan Welch, Michael Laver, Charles D. Hadley, Michael Marsh, Malcolm Mackerras, Judith R. Walkowitz, Carol McClurg Mueller and Joyce Gelb. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Political Science, Electoral Studies, Journal of Women Politics & Policy, PS Political Science & Politics and Public Opinion Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact