Ŕobert C. Drews

96 papers receiving 859 citations

Peers

Ŕobert C. Drews
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Ophthalmology 661
  • Archeology 218
  • Anthropology 178
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 412
  • Paleontology 87
Replace John Landers with:
John Landers Australia
Mark Hassall Australia
Nicholas P. Herrmann United States
Denise Ferembach France
F Kósa Hungary
Jacqueline A. Turner United States
Sam D. Stout United States
Keiko Kitagawa Germany
Alfred Czarnetzki Germany
Alice M. Brues United States
Ŕobert C. Drews relative to John Landers Australia John Landers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
John Landers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ŕobert C. Drews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ŕobert C. Drews's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ŕobert C. Drews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ŕobert C. Drews more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ŕobert C. Drews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ŕobert C. Drews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ŕobert C. Drews. The network helps show where Ŕobert C. Drews may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Ŕobert C. Drews, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ŕobert C. Drews Line = papers co-authored together Ŕobert C. Drews links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 114 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198995
2 199472
3 198749
4 198344
5 197844
6
Early Riders: The Beginnings of Mounted Warfare in Asia and Europe
200441
7 198340
8 197835
9 197831
10 196431
11 198030
12 195929
13 198228
14 198824
15 200424
16 197522
17 199221
18 198818
19 196916
20 197616

About Ŕobert C. Drews

Ŕobert C. Drews is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Archeology, Anthropology and Surgery, having authored 114 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (31 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (18 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (17 papers), Ancient Near East History (13 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (12 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (10 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (10 papers) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (661 citations), Archeology (218 citations), Anthropology (178 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (412 citations) and Paleontology (87 citations). Ŕobert C. Drews has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Puerto Rico. Frequent co-authors include Joan Oates, Louis Girard, Stephen R. Waltman, Morton E. Smith, Mabel L. Lang, Bernard Becker, Henry R. Immerwahr, Carol G. Thomas, Guillermo A. do Pico and Tsuyoshi Yamashita. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Ophthalmology, The American Journal of Philology, Ophthalmology, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery and Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact