Robert C. Barbour
Impact in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Forest ecology and management
-
- Plant and animal studies
Papers in
-
- Plant and animal studies 14
-
- Genetically Modified Organisms Research 6
- Co-authors
- BM Potts (19 shared papers)René E. Vaillancourt (12 shared papers)Andrew B. Hingston (1 shared paper)Julianne M. O’Reilly-Wapstra (4 shared papers)Dorothy A. Steane (2 shared papers)M. Mimura (1 shared paper)Kazuo Watanabe (1 shared paper)Joseph K. Bailey (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Forest Ecology and Management (5 papers)Australian Journal of Botany (2 papers)Tree Genetics & Genomes (2 papers)New Forests (1 paper)Oecologia (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Robert C. Barbour
20 papers receiving 733 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 331
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 348
- Ecological Modeling 64
- Genetics 282
- Ecology 198
Countries citing papers authored by Robert C. Barbour
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert C. Barbour's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert C. Barbour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert C. Barbour more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert C. Barbour
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert C. Barbour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert C. Barbour. The network helps show where Robert C. Barbour may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert C. Barbour, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 150 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 124 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 80 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 56 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 40 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 39 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 37 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 36 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 35 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 32 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 30 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 28 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 21 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 17 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 9 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 7 |
About Robert C. Barbour
Robert C. Barbour is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Ecology, Genetics and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 20 papers that have together received 791 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (14 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (6 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (6 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (6 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (3 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (2 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (331 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (348 citations), Ecological Modeling (64 citations), Genetics (282 citations) and Ecology (198 citations). Robert C. Barbour has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include BM Potts, René E. Vaillancourt, Andrew B. Hingston, Julianne M. O’Reilly-Wapstra, Dorothy A. Steane, M. Mimura, Kazuo Watanabe, Joseph K. Bailey, Thomas G. Whitham and W. N. Tibbits. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Australian Journal of Botany, Tree Genetics & Genomes, New Forests and Oecologia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.