Robert C. Barbour

19 papers receiving 691 citations

Peers

Robert C. Barbour
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 296
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 323
  • Ecological Modeling 58
  • Genetics 270
  • Cell Biology 113
Replace Laurent Amsellem with:
Laurent Amsellem France
Anna K. Jasiñska Poland
Amanda R. De La Torre United States
Rebecca C. Jones Australia
Caroline Scotti‐Saintagne France
Andrew D. Bower United States
Nathalie Escaravage France
J. Buiteveld Netherlands
María Rosario García‐Gil Sweden
Amy V. Whipple United States
Robert C. Barbour relative to Laurent Amsellem France Laurent Amsellem's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Laurent Amsellem · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert C. Barbour

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert C. Barbour's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert C. Barbour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert C. Barbour more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert C. Barbour

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert C. Barbour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert C. Barbour. The network helps show where Robert C. Barbour may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert C. Barbour, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert C. Barbour Line = papers co-authored together Robert C. Barbour links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2003143
2 2009113
3 200978
4 200555
5 200840
6 200839
7 200236
8 200934
9 200334
10 200931
11 200628
12 201028
13 200621
14 201316
15 201314
16 201310
17 20148
18 20097
19 20167

About Robert C. Barbour

Robert C. Barbour is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Genetics, Ecology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 19 papers that have together received 742 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (13 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (6 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (6 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (5 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (3 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (2 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (296 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (323 citations), Ecological Modeling (58 citations), Genetics (270 citations) and Cell Biology (113 citations). Robert C. Barbour has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include BM Potts, René E. Vaillancourt, Andrew B. Hingston, Julianne M. O’Reilly-Wapstra, Dorothy A. Steane, Kazuo Watanabe, M. Mimura, W. N. Tibbits, Susan C. Baker and Joseph K. Bailey. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Australian Journal of Botany, Tree Genetics & Genomes, Conservation Genetics and Conservation Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact