Robert A. Reckhow

1.6k citations
10 papers · 1.1k · 1 hit paper · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Robert A. Reckhow

10 papers receiving 955 citations

Robert A. Reckhow's Hit Papers

The relative efficiency of propositional proof systems 1979 · 576 citations
5760+15+31Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

Robert A. Reckhow
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 769
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 143
  • Artificial Intelligence 647
  • Computer Networks and Communications 179
  • Software 29
Replace Sven Skyum with:
Sven Skyum Denmark
L. Berman United States
Prabhakar Ragde Canada
Leslie M. Goldschlager Australia
Yijie Han United States
Linda Pagli Italy
Peter van Emde Boas Netherlands
H. Ramesh India
Philip M. Spira United States
Peter Emde Boas Netherlands
Robert A. Reckhow relative to Sven Skyum Denmark Sven Skyum's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Sven Skyum · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert A. Reckhow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert A. Reckhow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert A. Reckhow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert A. Reckhow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert A. Reckhow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert A. Reckhow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert A. Reckhow. The network helps show where Robert A. Reckhow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Robert A. Reckhow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert A. Reckhow Line = papers co-authored together Robert A. Reckhow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

About Robert A. Reckhow

Robert A. Reckhow is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Computer Networks and Communications and Signal Processing, having authored 10 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation (4 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers), Cellular Automata and Applications (2 papers), Advanced Graph Theory Research (2 papers), Algorithms and Data Compression (2 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (2 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (2 papers) and Advanced Algebra and Logic (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (769 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (143 citations), Artificial Intelligence (647 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (179 citations) and Software (29 citations). Robert A. Reckhow has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Cook and Joseph Culberson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Computer and System Sciences, Journal of Algorithms, Journal of Symbolic Logic, ACM SIGACT News and Foundations of Computer Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact