Rob Proctor
Impact in
-
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
-
- Social Media and Politics
Papers in
-
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 2
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 1
-
- Homelessness and Social Issues 1
- Co-authors
- Paul G. Lewis (1 shared paper)Tim Newburn (1 shared paper)Matthew Colless (1 shared paper)J. R. Lucey (1 shared paper)Christopher M. Springob (1 shared paper)Chiaki Kobayashi (1 shared paper)J. R. Mould (1 shared paper)Christina Magoulas (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (1 paper)Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union (1 paper)London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazilAustralia
In The Last Decade
Rob Proctor
3 papers receiving 145 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Instrumentation 13
- Communication 21
- Sociology and Political Science 102
- Political Science and International Relations 52
- Public Administration 7
Countries citing papers authored by Rob Proctor
This map shows the geographic impact of Rob Proctor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rob Proctor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rob Proctor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rob Proctor
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rob Proctor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rob Proctor. The network helps show where Rob Proctor may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Rob Proctor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reading the riots : investigating England's summer of disorder | 2011 | 157 |
| 2 | 2012 | 21 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 1 |
About Rob Proctor
Rob Proctor is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, General Health Professions, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Instrumentation and Infectious Diseases, having authored 3 papers that have together received 179 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (2 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (1 paper), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (1 paper), Advanced Image Processing Techniques (1 paper), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (1 paper) and Advanced Vision and Imaging (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (13 citations), Communication (21 citations), Sociology and Political Science (102 citations), Political Science and International Relations (52 citations) and Public Administration (7 citations). Rob Proctor has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Paul G. Lewis, Tim Newburn, Matthew Colless, J. R. Lucey, Christopher M. Springob, Chiaki Kobayashi, J. R. Mould, Christina Magoulas, D. H. P. Jones and Lachlan Campbell. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union and London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.