RM Grounds

7.0k citations
65 papers · 4.6k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

RM Grounds

65 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Peers

RM Grounds
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 1.6k
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 1.0k
  • Developmental Neuroscience 615
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.1k
  • Nephrology 332
Replace Charles W. Hogue with:
Charles W. Hogue United States
L. Lindgren Finland
Olivier Langeron France
Anthony D. Ivankovich United States
Robert N. Sladen United States
Harry J. M. Lemmens United States
I. Murat France
Philip D. Lumb United States
B. Tavernier France
Douglas B. Coursin United States
RM Grounds relative to Charles W. Hogue United States Charles W. Hogue's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Charles W. Hogue · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by RM Grounds

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of RM Grounds's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by RM Grounds with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites RM Grounds more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by RM Grounds

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by RM Grounds. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by RM Grounds. The network helps show where RM Grounds may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside RM Grounds, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with RM Grounds Line = papers co-authored together RM Grounds links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005474
2 2006455
3 1999410
4 2000367
5 2001283
6 2001272
7 2002188
8 1985185
9 2001164
10 2003148
11 2005146
12 1987125
13 1988105
14 200590
15 199385
16 198682
17 200279
18 201375
19 201672
20 199071

About RM Grounds

RM Grounds is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 65 papers that have together received 4.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (25 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (19 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (17 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (14 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (10 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (5 papers) and Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (1.6k citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (1.0k citations), Developmental Neuroscience (615 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.1k citations) and Nephrology (332 citations). RM Grounds has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include R.M. Venn, Andrew Rhodes, Ed Bennett, Rupert M. Pearse, Deborah Dawson, Richard Venn, Michael K. Morgan, Jayne Fawcett, Philip J. Newman and Michael D. Karol. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Care, Anaesthesia, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact