R.F.W. Goodwin

974 citations
59 papers · 837 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

R.F.W. Goodwin

57 papers receiving 645 citations

Peers

R.F.W. Goodwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Microbiology 415
  • Animal Science and Zoology 233
  • Small Animals 129
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 99
  • Parasitology 42
Replace A. Wiseman with:
A. Wiseman United Kingdom
L. Kirk Clark United States
John W. Osebold United States
Dagmar Ε. Frank United States
K. Haverson United Kingdom
Ronald W. Scamurra United States
A. E. Pierce Slovakia
J. Krejčí Czechia
C. B. Thomas United States
Yukio Yagi Japan
R.F.W. Goodwin relative to A. Wiseman United Kingdom A. Wiseman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
A. Wiseman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R.F.W. Goodwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R.F.W. Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.F.W. Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.F.W. Goodwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R.F.W. Goodwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.F.W. Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.F.W. Goodwin. The network helps show where R.F.W. Goodwin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside R.F.W. Goodwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R.F.W. Goodwin Line = papers co-authored together R.F.W. Goodwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196759
2 196953
3 195653
4 195743
5 197343
6 195639
7 196934
8 195828
9 197224
10 195523
11 196822
12 195921
13 195820
14 195219
15 195719
16 196218
17 195616
18 195516
19
Production of enzootic pneumonia in pigs with an agent grown in tissue culture from the natural disease.
196315
20 197114

About R.F.W. Goodwin

R.F.W. Goodwin is a scholar working on Microbiology, Epidemiology, Small Animals, Animal Science and Zoology and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 59 papers that have together received 837 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial infections and disease research (33 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (9 papers), Animal Virus Infections Studies (9 papers), Blood groups and transfusion (6 papers), Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases (6 papers), Animal health and immunology (4 papers), Coccidia and coccidiosis research (4 papers) and Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (415 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (233 citations), Small Animals (129 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (99 citations) and Parasitology (42 citations). R.F.W. Goodwin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Portugal and United States. Frequent co-authors include P. Whittlestone, R.R.A. Coombs, A.R. Jennings, Ruth Saison, Barry Cross, Ian A. Silver, N. Chanter, J. M. Rutter, David Burch and Dorothy Heard. Their work appears in journals such as Research in Veterinary Science, Veterinary Record, The Journal of Physiology, Nature and Epidemiology and Infection.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact