Rebecca E. Forkner

26 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Rebecca E. Forkner
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 422
  • Ecological Modeling 120
  • Biochemistry 151
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 505
  • Insect Science 293
Replace Svetlana Ossipova with:
Svetlana Ossipova Finland
Riitta Julkunen‐Tiitto Finland
Kyösti Lempa Finland
Valdely Ferreira Kinupp Brazil
Johanna Witzell Sweden
Anne Bousquet‐Mélou France
Yule Roberta Ferreira Nunes Brazil
Almuth Hammerbacher South Africa
Dean Nicolle Australia
Bodil Ehlers Denmark
Rebecca E. Forkner relative to Svetlana Ossipova Finland Svetlana Ossipova's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Svetlana Ossipova · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rebecca E. Forkner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rebecca E. Forkner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebecca E. Forkner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebecca E. Forkner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rebecca E. Forkner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebecca E. Forkner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebecca E. Forkner. The network helps show where Rebecca E. Forkner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rebecca E. Forkner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rebecca E. Forkner Line = papers co-authored together Rebecca E. Forkner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002275
2 2004215
3 2000191
4 200880
5 200677
6 199958
7 200640
8 201129
9 200429
10 200526
11 201926
12 200625
13 200424
14 201318
15 201018
16 200017
17 200012
18 20109
19
Impact of timber harvest on species accumulation curves for oak herbivore communities of the Missouri Ozarks
20029
20 20135

About Rebecca E. Forkner

Rebecca E. Forkner is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Insect Science and Plant Science, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (13 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (10 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (7 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (7 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (5 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (3 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (2 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (422 citations), Ecological Modeling (120 citations), Biochemistry (151 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (505 citations) and Insect Science (293 citations). Rebecca E. Forkner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Mark D. Hunter, Robert J. Marquis, John T. Lill, Ann Hagerman, Josiane Le Corff, Nicole Darnall, A.D. Taylor, Daniel S. Gruner, Nicholas A. Barber and Peter Stiling. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology, Ecological Entomology, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, Phytochemical Analysis and Insect Conservation and Diversity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact