R.E. Peck

1.1k citations
36 papers · 973 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

R.E. Peck

36 papers receiving 936 citations

Peers

R.E. Peck
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 316
  • Computational Mechanics 640
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 113
  • Biomedical Engineering 377
  • Aerospace Engineering 206
Replace A. M. Mellor with:
A. M. Mellor United States
T.A. Brzustowski Canada
Paul O. Hedman United States
M. Namazian United States
Toshikazu Kadota Japan
V. S. Babkin Russia
C. Allouis Italy
Toshimi TAKAGI Japan
Nikolaos Zarzalis Germany
W.J. McLean United States
R.E. Peck relative to A. M. Mellor United States A. M. Mellor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
A. M. Mellor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R.E. Peck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R.E. Peck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.E. Peck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.E. Peck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R.E. Peck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.E. Peck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.E. Peck. The network helps show where R.E. Peck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside R.E. Peck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R.E. Peck Line = papers co-authored together R.E. Peck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008312
2 200599
3 199099
4 199080
5 199160
6 199639
7 199130
8 199028
9 198328
10 199624
11 198622
12 197819
13 197918
14 198818
15 198415
16 199913
17 198711
18 19849
19
An experimental study of combustion and heat transfer in porous radiant burners
19898
20 19946

About R.E. Peck

R.E. Peck is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Biomedical Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, having authored 36 papers that have together received 973 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Combustion and flame dynamics (23 papers), Radiative Heat Transfer Studies (11 papers), Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes (7 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (6 papers), Fire dynamics and safety research (6 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (4 papers), Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies (3 papers) and Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (316 citations), Computational Mechanics (640 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (113 citations), Biomedical Engineering (377 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (206 citations). R.E. Peck has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include T.W. Tong, Sanjeev B. Sathe, J. Rafael Pacheco, Ravi Prasher, Patrick E. Phelan, Himanshu Tyagi, Taewoo Lee, Manohar Kulkarni, Robert A. Altenkirch and Arturo Pacheco-Vega. Their work appears in journals such as Combustion Science and Technology, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Combustion and Flame, Powder Technology and Numerical Heat Transfer Part B Fundamentals.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact