Raymond E. Chaplin

434 citations
13 papers · 305 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
    • Evolution and Paleontology Studies
    • Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology

Papers in

Raymond E. Chaplin

13 papers receiving 235 citations

Peers

Raymond E. Chaplin
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Paleontology 124
  • Anthropology 87
  • Archeology 90
  • Ecology 123
  • Geography, Planning and Development 23
Replace Sándor Bökönyi with:
Sándor Bökönyi Hungary
A.T. Clason Netherlands
Linas Daugnora Lithuania
Jaco Weinstock United Kingdom
Isabelle Carrère France
Michael MacKinnon Canada
François Poplin France
Cluny Johnstone United Kingdom
Małgosia Nowak-Kemp United Kingdom
François Briois France
Raymond E. Chaplin relative to Sándor Bökönyi Hungary Sándor Bökönyi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Sándor Bökönyi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Raymond E. Chaplin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Raymond E. Chaplin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raymond E. Chaplin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raymond E. Chaplin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Raymond E. Chaplin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raymond E. Chaplin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raymond E. Chaplin. The network helps show where Raymond E. Chaplin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Raymond E. Chaplin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Raymond E. Chaplin Line = papers co-authored together Raymond E. Chaplin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1972161
2 197236
3 197733
4 196921
5 196917
6 196510
7 19689
8 19756
9 19664
10 19733
11 19662
12 19752
13 19731

About Raymond E. Chaplin

Raymond E. Chaplin is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Paleontology, Agronomy and Crop Science and Genetics, having authored 13 papers that have together received 305 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (8 papers), Ecology and biodiversity studies (5 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (3 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (2 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (1 paper), Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies (1 paper), Meat and Animal Product Quality (1 paper) and Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (124 citations), Anthropology (87 citations), Archeology (90 citations), Ecology (123 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (23 citations). Raymond E. Chaplin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Don Brothwell, Robert W. White, D. I. Chapman, D. D. Harkness, Robert Jones and B. A. Young. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Zoology, Reproduction, Antiquity, International Zoo Yearbook and Man.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact