R.A. Jones

45 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

R.A. Jones
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Catalysis 124
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 195
  • Ophthalmology 83
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 125
  • Oceanography 106
Replace Steven M. Japar with:
Steven M. Japar United States
Hiroshi Ichikawa Japan
Osamu Sato Japan
Wenhui Wang China
John Watson United Kingdom
Yunfeng Wang China
Bing Li China
Yuichiro Tanaka Japan
Kunal Ghosh India
R. J. Phillips United Kingdom
R.A. Jones relative to Steven M. Japar United States Steven M. Japar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15.1×
Steven M. Japar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R.A. Jones

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R.A. Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.A. Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.A. Jones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R.A. Jones

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.A. Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.A. Jones. The network helps show where R.A. Jones may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside R.A. Jones, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R.A. Jones Line = papers co-authored together R.A. Jones links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003129
2 1981122
3 1958107
4 199676
5 199467
6 199062
7 198057
8 196654
9 199450
10 199345
11 199841
12 197234
13 197731
14 200329
15 199824
16 198824
17 197022
18 197321
19 196118
20 199714

About R.A. Jones

R.A. Jones is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Analytical Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (9 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (4 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (3 papers), Marine and fisheries research (3 papers), Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (3 papers), Water Quality and Resources Studies (3 papers), Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (3 papers) and Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Catalysis (124 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (195 citations), Ophthalmology (83 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (125 citations) and Oceanography (106 citations). R.A. Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Nick Fogt, Rudolf Jaffé, M. Venugopalan, Gregory B. Noe, Leonard J. Scinto, Robert F. Doren, Daniel L. Childers, Yong Cai, R. F. Mann and Michael J. Evans. Their work appears in journals such as Vision Research, Optometry and Vision Science, Analytical Chemistry, Canadian Journal of Chemistry and Journal of Environmental Quality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact