R. Roscher
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- R. Bittner (13 shared papers)Markus W. Büchler (3 shared papers)Hans G. Beger (2 shared papers)W. Oettinger (3 shared papers)Markus Büchler (3 shared papers)S. Block (2 shared papers)Timo J. Nevalainen (1 shared paper)F. Safi (12 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
R. Roscher
37 papers receiving 746 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Oncology 382
- Surgery 544
- Emergency Medicine 40
- Gastroenterology 19
- Epidemiology 102
Countries citing papers authored by R. Roscher
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Roscher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Roscher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Roscher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. Roscher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Roscher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Roscher. The network helps show where R. Roscher may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside R. Roscher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1988 | 218 | |
| 2 | 1989 | 174 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 96 | |
| 4 | 1987 | 49 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 44 | |
| 6 | Tumor markers in pancreatic cancer. Sensitivity and specificity of CA 19-9. | 1989 | 34 |
| 7 | 1988 | 30 | |
| 8 | The clinical relevance of the tumor marker CA 19-9 in the diagnosing and monitoring of pancreatic carcinoma. | 1990 | 24 |
| 9 | 1987 | 15 | |
| 10 | 1974 | 15 | |
| 11 | [Effect of tumor size and lymph node status on the prognosis of pancreatic cancer]. | 1989 | 14 |
| 12 | 1998 | 12 | |
| 13 | Pancreatic pseudocyst of the mediastinum. Evaluation by CT. | 1986 | 8 |
| 14 | 1996 | 6 | |
| 15 | [Pathophysiology of ileus]. | 1998 | 6 |
| 16 | 1988 | 4 | |
| 17 | [Use of imaging procedures in gallstone ileus]. | 1990 | 4 |
| 18 | 1969 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1987 | 3 | |
| 20 | [Thrombotic occlusion and late lysis in the arteria subclavia lusoria dextra]. | 1975 | 3 |
About R. Roscher
R. Roscher is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Hepatology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 793 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (14 papers), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (8 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (8 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (4 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (3 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (3 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (3 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (382 citations), Surgery (544 citations), Emergency Medicine (40 citations), Gastroenterology (19 citations) and Epidemiology (102 citations). R. Roscher has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Finland and Russia. Frequent co-authors include R. Bittner, Markus W. Büchler, Hans G. Beger, W. Oettinger, Markus Büchler, S. Block, Timo J. Nevalainen, F. Safi, H. G. Beger and H. G. Beger. Their work appears in journals such as Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery, Pancreas, Cancer Investigation, European Journal of Anaesthesiology and The American Journal of Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.