R. Maillet

725 citations
43 papers · 500 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

R. Maillet

39 papers receiving 469 citations

Peers

R. Maillet
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 194
  • Rheumatology 114
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 122
  • Reproductive Medicine 27
  • Urology 12
Replace Fidelma O’Mahony with:
Fidelma O’Mahony United Kingdom
Ohad Gluck Israel
Katarina Tunón Sweden
DA Cromwell United Kingdom
B Strachan United Kingdom
Michael D. Moen United States
Aysu Akça Türkiye
Sambit Mukhopadhyay United Kingdom
TA Mahmood United Kingdom
Cora A. Fanning Canada
R. Maillet relative to Fidelma O’Mahony United Kingdom Fidelma O’Mahony's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Fidelma O’Mahony · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R. Maillet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Maillet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Maillet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Maillet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Maillet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Maillet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Maillet. The network helps show where R. Maillet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside R. Maillet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R. Maillet Line = papers co-authored together R. Maillet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200947
2 200943
3 200937
4 201035
5 200934
6 200528
7 200527
8 200826
9 201325
10 200024
11 200620
12 200415
13 201315
14 200814
15 200811
16 200710
17 20089
18 20089
19 20069
20 20098

About R. Maillet

R. Maillet is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Rheumatology, Surgery and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 43 papers that have together received 500 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (13 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (6 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (4 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (3 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (3 papers), Health, Medicine and Society (2 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (2 papers) and Uterine Myomas and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (194 citations), Rheumatology (114 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (122 citations), Reproductive Medicine (27 citations) and Urology (12 citations). R. Maillet has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include D. Riethmuller, R. Ramanah, A. Martin, Anne Collin, J.-P. Schaal, Cynthia L. Gay, Nathalie Floret, P. Millet, Maxime Desmarets and Hubert Allemand. Their work appears in journals such as Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, Archives de Pédiatrie, Sages-Femmes, The French Journal of Urology and Journal de gynécologie, obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction. Supplément.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact