R Dauman

65 papers receiving 869 citations

Peers

R Dauman
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Sensory Systems 495
  • Neurology 269
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 498
  • Speech and Hearing 117
  • Otorhinolaryngology 69
Replace Carl Verschuur with:
Carl Verschuur United Kingdom
David Shipp Canada
David A. Fabry United States
Bruno Frachet France
Mario Cebulla Germany
Griet Mertens Belgium
Hyun Joon Shim South Korea
Mathieu Marx France
Dawn Konrad‐Martin United States
Marek Polák United States
R Dauman relative to Carl Verschuur United Kingdom Carl Verschuur's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Carl Verschuur · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R Dauman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R Dauman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R Dauman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R Dauman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R Dauman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R Dauman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R Dauman. The network helps show where R Dauman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside R Dauman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R Dauman Line = papers co-authored together R Dauman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005136
2 2011107
3 201095
4
Clinical significance of the summating potential in Menière's disease.
198842
5 199240
6 198640
7 201335
8 199321
9 201721
10
Betahistine dihydrochloride versus flunarizine. A double-blind study on recurrent vertigo with or without cochlear syndrome typical of Menière's disease.
199121
11 199117
12
40 Hz middle latency responses to low frequency tone pips in normally hearing adults.
198417
13 200316
14 201415
15 200915
16 198414
17 200414
18
(Treatment of sudden deafness: first results of a comparative study).
198514
19 198911
20 201211

About R Dauman

R Dauman is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Neurology, having authored 72 papers that have together received 906 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (31 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (25 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (24 papers), Noise Effects and Management (6 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (4 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (4 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (3 papers) and Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (495 citations), Neurology (269 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (498 citations), Speech and Hearing (117 citations) and Otorhinolaryngology (69 citations). R Dauman has collaborated with scholars based in France, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include M Portmann, Jean–Marie Aran, J.‐M. Aran, Richard S. Tyler, R Sauvage, Nicolas Dauman, Bernard Fraysse, Yves Cazals, Bruno Frachet and Birger Kollmeier. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Oto-Laryngologica, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Clinical Otolaryngology and European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact