R. Anthore

34 papers receiving 762 citations

Peers

R. Anthore
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Organic Chemistry 359
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 67
  • Catalysis 60
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 75
  • Filtration and Separation 16
Replace C. Petipas with:
C. Petipas France
Akihisa Shioi Japan
L. W. Barr United Kingdom
Simon C. McGrother United Kingdom
M. D’Angelo France
Susanta Das United States
J.P. Hawranek Poland
J. Jen Germany
John S. Huang United States
John B. Cooper United States
R. Anthore relative to C. Petipas France C. Petipas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
C. Petipas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R. Anthore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Anthore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Anthore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Anthore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Anthore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Anthore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Anthore. The network helps show where R. Anthore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside R. Anthore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R. Anthore Line = papers co-authored together R. Anthore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989175
2 200448
3 199543
4 198338
5 199137
6 199236
7 198236
8 198334
9 198331
10 198729
11 199328
12 200128
13 199624
14 199722
15 199620
16 199819
17 199619
18 198018
19 199016
20 199015

About R. Anthore

R. Anthore is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Computational Mechanics, Biomedical Engineering, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, having authored 34 papers that have together received 801 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (14 papers), Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (6 papers), Granular flow and fluidized beds (6 papers), Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions (5 papers), Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (5 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (3 papers), Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies (3 papers) and Thermodynamic properties of mixtures (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (359 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (67 citations), Catalysis (60 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (75 citations) and Filtration and Separation (16 citations). R. Anthore has collaborated with scholars based in France and Poland. Frequent co-authors include C. Petipas, Xavier Auvray, Armand Lattes, I. Rico, F. Feuillebois, Isabelle Rico‐Lattes, N. Lecoq, A. Martinet, H. Balard and Eugène Papírer. Their work appears in journals such as Langmuir, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, Physics of Fluids, Journal of Fluid Mechanics and The Journal of Physical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact