Q. Kong

1.0k citations
68 papers · 820 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Q. Kong

64 papers receiving 798 citations

Peers

Q. Kong
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 738
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 602
  • Mechanics of Materials 421
  • Radiation 58
  • Computational Mechanics 119
Replace L. Lancia with:
L. Lancia France
Luca Fedeli Italy
N. Blanchot France
G. M. Oleĭnik Russia
Igor V. Glazyrin Russia
Eisuke Miura Japan
Hann-Shin Mao United States
A. P. L. Robinson United Kingdom
D. E. Mittelberger United States
A. Lifschitz France
Q. Kong relative to L. Lancia France L. Lancia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
L. Lancia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Q. Kong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Q. Kong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Q. Kong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Q. Kong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Q. Kong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Q. Kong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Q. Kong. The network helps show where Q. Kong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Q. Kong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Q. Kong Line = papers co-authored together Q. Kong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001108
2 199883
3 200273
4 200043
5 199936
6 200334
7 200432
8 200231
9 200823
10 200722
11 200522
12 201417
13 201017
14 200516
15 200715
16 200414
17 201114
18 199814
19 202213
20 200612

About Q. Kong

Q. Kong is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Mechanics of Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computational Mechanics and Geophysics, having authored 68 papers that have together received 820 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (64 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (42 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (40 papers), Laser Material Processing Techniques (11 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (10 papers), Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (7 papers), Laser Design and Applications (5 papers) and Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (738 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (602 citations), Mechanics of Materials (421 citations), Radiation (58 citations) and Computational Mechanics (119 citations). Q. Kong has collaborated with scholars based in China, Japan and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Y. K. Ho, S. Kawata, P. X. Wang, Xiaoqing Yuan, Lu Feng, E. Esarey, Yasushi Nishida, Y. J. Gu, X. F. Li and A.M. Sessler. Their work appears in journals such as Physics of Plasmas, Journal of Applied Physics, Applied Physics Letters, Europhysics Letters (EPL) and Applied Physics B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact