Prodip Bose

42 papers receiving 869 citations

Peers

Prodip Bose
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 402
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 271
  • Rehabilitation 90
  • Neurology 93
  • Neurology 171
Replace Rahul K. Nath with:
Rahul K. Nath United States
Ricardo Fadić Chile
Doris Maier Germany
Corey Hunter United States
Jeehyun Yoo South Korea
George Tharion India
Tsuneo Takebayashi Japan
K T Ragnarsson United States
Nur Yüceyar Türkiye
Patricia W. Nance Canada
Prodip Bose relative to Rahul K. Nath United States Rahul K. Nath's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Rahul K. Nath · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Prodip Bose

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Prodip Bose's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Prodip Bose with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Prodip Bose more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Prodip Bose

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Prodip Bose. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Prodip Bose. The network helps show where Prodip Bose may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Prodip Bose, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Prodip Bose Line = papers co-authored together Prodip Bose links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201455
2 200454
3 201350
4 200648
5 200147
6 200246
7 200843
8 201240
9 201440
10 201637
11 200131
12 201031
13 200131
14 201230
15 201829
16
Bone loss in a new rodent model combining spinal cord injury and cast immobilization.
201425
17 201224
18 200622
19 199722
20 200219

About Prodip Bose

Prodip Bose is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology, Surgery and Epidemiology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 895 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (15 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (10 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (7 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (6 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (5 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (5 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (5 papers) and Hormonal and reproductive studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (402 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (271 citations), Rehabilitation (90 citations), Neurology (93 citations) and Neurology (171 citations). Prodip Bose has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Floyd J. Thompson, Ronald Parmer, Paul J. Reier, Krista Vandenborne, Glenn A. Walter, Stephen E. Borst, Christine F. Conover, Joshua F. Yarrow, David C. Wang and Douglas K. Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurotrauma, Experimental Neurology, European Journal of Applied Physiology, Brain Research and Brain Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact