Prodip Bose

42 papers receiving 880 citations

Peers

Prodip Bose
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 364
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 201
  • Neurology 155
  • Neurology 87
  • Rehabilitation 61
Replace Keith Sequeira with:
Keith Sequeira Canada
Rahul K. Nath United States
G A Delaney Canada
Ellen Merete Hagen Norway
Ceyla İrkeç Türkiye
G. Cunin France
Virginia Graziani United States
Marta Altieri Italy
Jens A. Petersen Switzerland
Hendrik van de Meent Netherlands
Prodip Bose relative to Keith Sequeira Canada Keith Sequeira's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Keith Sequeira · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Prodip Bose

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Prodip Bose's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Prodip Bose with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Prodip Bose more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Prodip Bose

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Prodip Bose. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Prodip Bose. The network helps show where Prodip Bose may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Prodip Bose, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Prodip Bose Line = papers co-authored together Prodip Bose links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201456
2 200454
3 201350
4 200649
5 200147
6 200246
7 200843
8 201241
9 201440
10 201639
11 201032
12 200131
13 200131
14 201230
15 201830
16
Bone loss in a new rodent model combining spinal cord injury and cast immobilization.
201426
17 201225
18 199722
19 200622
20 201919

About Prodip Bose

Prodip Bose is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology, Surgery and Epidemiology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 905 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (15 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (9 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (7 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (6 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (5 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (5 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (5 papers) and Hormonal and reproductive studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (364 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (201 citations), Neurology (155 citations), Neurology (87 citations) and Rehabilitation (61 citations). Prodip Bose has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Floyd J. Thompson, Ronald Parmer, Paul J. Reier, Krista Vandenborne, Glenn A. Walter, Stephen E. Borst, Christine F. Conover, David C. Wang, Douglas K. Anderson and Joshua F. Yarrow. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurotrauma, Experimental Neurology, Brain Research, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Neuroreport.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact