Pratik Phansopkar
About
In The Last Decade
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pratik Phansopkar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pratik Phansopkar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pratik Phansopkar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pratik Phansopkar. Pratik Phansopkar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Pratik Phansopkar
73 papers receiving 170 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Pratik Phansopkar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pratik Phansopkar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pratik Phansopkar. The network helps show where Pratik Phansopkar may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Pratik Phansopkar
This map shows the geographic impact of Pratik Phansopkar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pratik Phansopkar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pratik Phansopkar more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.