Po‐Ting Chen

35 papers receiving 592 citations

Peers

Po‐Ting Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Health Informatics 22
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 206
  • Oncology 222
  • Artificial Intelligence 187
  • Neurology 36
Replace Yuka Kiriyama with:
Yuka Kiriyama Japan
Quanyuan Shan China
Jie Ding China
Akif Burak Tosun United States
Xingyu Li China
Yongtao Zhang China
Jianqiao Zhou China
Eun Kyung Park South Korea
Jiangang Chen China
Juan Zhou China
Po‐Ting Chen relative to Yuka Kiriyama Japan Yuka Kiriyama's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Yuka Kiriyama · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Po‐Ting Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Po‐Ting Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Po‐Ting Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Po‐Ting Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Po‐Ting Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Po‐Ting Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Po‐Ting Chen. The network helps show where Po‐Ting Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Po‐Ting Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Po‐Ting Chen Line = papers co-authored together Po‐Ting Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020163
2 2022106
3 202145
4 201640
5 202025
6 202123
7 201018
8 200916
9 201613
10 200913
11 201912
12 201712
13 202212
14 202310
15 201110
16 20218
17 20238
18 20218
19 20167
20 20236

About Po‐Ting Chen

Po‐Ting Chen is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Oncology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Surgery and Molecular Medicine, having authored 41 papers that have together received 603 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (9 papers), Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (5 papers), COVID-19 diagnosis using AI (4 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (4 papers), AI in cancer detection (4 papers), Thin-Film Transistor Technologies (3 papers), Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors (3 papers) and Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (22 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (206 citations), Oncology (222 citations), Artificial Intelligence (187 citations) and Neurology (36 citations). Po‐Ting Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Kao‐Lang Liu, Weichung Wang, Wei‐Chih Liao, Ming‐Shiang Wu, Holger R. Roth, Tinghui Wu, Yu‐Hsiang Tsai, Po‐Chuan Wang, Rita P.‐Y. Chen and Shih‐Che Huang. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Gastroenterology, IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability and Endocrine Connections.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact