Pitt Lim

5.3k citations
100 papers · 2.7k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Pitt Lim

85 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Pitt Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 867
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.1k
  • Surgery 687
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 123
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 227
Replace Jeong Bae Park with:
Jeong Bae Park South Korea
Guido Arcaro Italy
Jay M. Sullivan United States
Στέλλα Δούμα Greece
Stefano Bevilacqua Italy
Gregorio Brevetti Italy
Lawrence Title Canada
Luciano Zenari Italy
Shuaib Abdullah United States
James M. McLenachan United Kingdom
Pitt Lim relative to Jeong Bae Park South Korea Jeong Bae Park's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Jeong Bae Park · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pitt Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pitt Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pitt Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pitt Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pitt Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pitt Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pitt Lim. The network helps show where Pitt Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pitt Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pitt Lim Line = papers co-authored together Pitt Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 100 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001262
2 2000215
3 2004145
4 2001144
5 1999136
6 2008115
7 199697
8 201292
9 200292
10 201789
11 201877
12 200469
13 200457
14 200257
15 197856
16 197853
17 201552
18 202049
19 196947
20 199944

About Pitt Lim

Pitt Lim is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 100 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (13 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (13 papers), Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (12 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (11 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (11 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (8 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (7 papers) and Vascular Procedures and Complications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (867 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.1k citations), Surgery (687 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (123 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (227 citations). Pitt Lim has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Singapore and United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas M. MacDonald, Nikolaos Tzemos, Allan D. Struthers, Eleanor Dow, William F. Young, G. Brennan, Roland Jung, Edward Jacob, P P Yeo and Michael Frenneaux. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Human Hypertension, American Journal of Hypertension, Heart, Journal of Hypertension and Hypertension.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact