Ping Qing

1.4k citations
64 papers · 1.1k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Ping Qing

60 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Ping Qing
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Business and International Management 64
  • Marketing 193
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 21
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86
  • Food Science 137
Replace David Oglethorpe with:
David Oglethorpe United Kingdom
Anastasios Michailidis Greece
Shijiu Yin China
Seneshaw Tamru Belgium
Theresa Selfa United States
Hikaru Hanawa Peterson United States
Ramu Govindasamy United States
Silvia Coderoni Italy
Roberta Raffaelli Italy
Stefano Corsi Italy
Ping Qing relative to David Oglethorpe United Kingdom David Oglethorpe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.5×
David Oglethorpe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping Qing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping Qing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping Qing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping Qing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping Qing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping Qing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping Qing. The network helps show where Ping Qing may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping Qing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping Qing Line = papers co-authored together Ping Qing links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020168
2 2012103
3 201991
4 202163
5 201945
6 201539
7 202137
8 201230
9 202130
10 202228
11 202227
12 202126
13 202125
14 201523
15 201420
16 202220
17 201620
18 201620
19 202318
20 202015

About Ping Qing

Ping Qing is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Food Science, Marketing, Plant Science and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability (11 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (8 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (6 papers), COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts (6 papers), Environmental Sustainability in Business (5 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (5 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (5 papers) and Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (64 citations), Marketing (193 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (21 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (86 citations) and Food Science (137 citations). Ping Qing has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Amar Razzaq, Wuyang Hu, Chongguang Li, António Lobo, Tong Chen, Shi Min, Debin Zhang, Fang Ding, Hakim Manghwar and Shengsong Xie. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie, Sustainability, Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, Foods and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact