Phoebe Li

31 papers receiving 341 citations

Peers

Phoebe Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Health Informatics 32
  • Automotive Engineering 83
  • Biomedical Engineering 153
  • Physiology 70
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 11
Replace Akash A. Chandawarkar with:
Akash A. Chandawarkar United States
Jordi Colomer‐Farrarons Spain
Pedram Iranmanesh Iran
Xianying He China
Zesheng Chen China
V. Miskovic Italy
Julien M Meyer Canada
Yunji Lee South Korea
Hong-En Chen United States
Meicen Liu China
Phoebe Li relative to Akash A. Chandawarkar United States Akash A. Chandawarkar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11×
Akash A. Chandawarkar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phoebe Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phoebe Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phoebe Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phoebe Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phoebe Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phoebe Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phoebe Li. The network helps show where Phoebe Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phoebe Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phoebe Li Line = papers co-authored together Phoebe Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202342
2 200937
3 201733
4
3D bioprinting technologies: patents, innovation and access
201431
5 202028
6 202321
7 201017
8 202316
9 200514
10 202414
11 202013
12 202313
13 202010
14 20189
15 20208
16 20218
17 20227
18 20216
19 20005
20 20235

About Phoebe Li

Phoebe Li is a scholar working on Physiology, Health Informatics, Biomedical Engineering, Management of Technology and Innovation and Automotive Engineering, having authored 32 papers that have together received 360 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (14 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (6 papers), Law, AI, and Intellectual Property (6 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (4 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (3 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (3 papers) and Biosensors and Analytical Detection (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (32 citations), Automotive Engineering (83 citations), Biomedical Engineering (153 citations), Physiology (70 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (11 citations). Phoebe Li has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Alex Faulkner, Christopher L. Stender, Teri W. Odom, Stuart O. Anderson, S. Gilbert, Robin Williams, Nicholas Medcalf, Jeremy E. Barton, Tom Melvin and James W. Chu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Law and the Biosciences, Law Innovation and Technology, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Biosensors and Bioelectronics and Journal of Materials Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact