Phoebe E. Freer

39 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Phoebe E. Freer
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 553
  • Cancer Research 213
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 214
  • Artificial Intelligence 251
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 150
Replace Janet E. Bailey with:
Janet E. Bailey United States
Peter M. Jokich United States
Haydee Ojeda‐Fournier United States
Ilse Vejborg Denmark
Rubina Manuela Trimboli Italy
Bhavika Patel United States
Rosalind Given-Wilson United Kingdom
Gábor Forrai Austria
Massimo Calabrese Italy
Rita I. Freimanis United States
Phoebe E. Freer relative to Janet E. Bailey United States Janet E. Bailey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
Janet E. Bailey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phoebe E. Freer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phoebe E. Freer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phoebe E. Freer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phoebe E. Freer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phoebe E. Freer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phoebe E. Freer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phoebe E. Freer. The network helps show where Phoebe E. Freer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phoebe E. Freer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phoebe E. Freer Line = papers co-authored together Phoebe E. Freer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015249
2 2020154
3 2017149
4 2013131
5 2013125
6 200769
7 201567
8 201157
9 202054
10 202254
11 201552
12 201151
13 201447
14 201742
15 201738
16 201434
17 201030
18 201730
19 201528
20 201525

About Phoebe E. Freer

Phoebe E. Freer is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cancer Research, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Surgery, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (19 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (12 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (6 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (4 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (2 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (2 papers) and AI in cancer detection (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (553 citations), Cancer Research (213 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (214 citations), Artificial Intelligence (251 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (150 citations). Phoebe E. Freer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth A. Rafferty, Min Xian, Aleksandar Vakanski, Bethany Lynn Niell, Kathryn L. Humphrey, Barbara Lynn Smith, Elizabeth Kagan Arleo, Jennifer S. Drukteinis, Robert Jared Weinfurtner and Elkan F. Halpern. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Radiology, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, Radiographics, Radiologic Clinics of North America and New England Journal of Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact