Phoebe E. Freer

33 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Phoebe E. Freer
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Cancer Research 375
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 423
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 317
  • Oncology 406
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 483
Replace Nick Perry with:
Nick Perry United Kingdom
Ilse Vejborg Denmark
Chris de Wolf United Kingdom
Vandana Dialani United States
Lucien E. M. Duijm Netherlands
Lora D. Barke United States
Donna Taylor Australia
Stamatia Destounis United States
Ilse Vejborg Denmark
Victoria L. Mango United States
Phoebe E. Freer relative to Nick Perry United Kingdom Nick Perry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Nick Perry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phoebe E. Freer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phoebe E. Freer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phoebe E. Freer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phoebe E. Freer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phoebe E. Freer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phoebe E. Freer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phoebe E. Freer. The network helps show where Phoebe E. Freer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phoebe E. Freer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phoebe E. Freer Line = papers co-authored together Phoebe E. Freer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015210
2 2017135
3 2013121
4 2013113
5 200767
6 201562
7 201553
8 202049
9 201148
10 201145
11 201442
12 201736
13 201735
14 201430
15 201529
16 201728
17 201028
18 201524
19 201717
20 201416

About Phoebe E. Freer

Phoebe E. Freer is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Cancer Research, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (15 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (13 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (13 papers), AI in cancer detection (10 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (10 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (5 papers) and Radiation Dose and Imaging (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (375 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (423 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (317 citations), Oncology (406 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (483 citations). Phoebe E. Freer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth A. Rafferty, Bethany L. Niell, Kathryn L. Humphrey, Barbara L. Smith, Elizabeth Kagan Arleo, Jennifer S. Drukteinis, R. Jared Weinfurtner, Elkan F. Halpern, Pragya A. Dang and Priscilla J. Slanetz. Their work appears in journals such as Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, Radiologic Clinics of North America, Radiographics, Journal of the American College of Radiology and New England Journal of Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact