Philip Stone

430 citations
11 papers · 354 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Stone

11 papers receiving 342 citations

Peers

Philip Stone
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 26
  • Control and Systems Engineering 135
  • Automotive Engineering 60
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 282
  • Environmental Engineering 61
Replace John Amy with:
John Amy United States
Simone Castellan Italy
Emmanuel De Jaeger Belgium
Atif Maqsood United States
Alf Kåre Ådnanes Norway
Jan Wenske Germany
Nuwantha Fernando Australia
Dale Dolan United States
Enzhe Song China
Philip Stone relative to John Amy United States John Amy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
John Amy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Stone. The network helps show where Philip Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Philip Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Stone Line = papers co-authored together Philip Stone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2015102
2 200973
3 201060
4 201052
5 201521
6 201115
7 201313
8 20128
9 20175
10 20114
11 20251

About Philip Stone

Philip Stone is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, Automotive Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 11 papers that have together received 354 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electrical Fault Detection and Protection (3 papers), Advanced Battery Technologies Research (2 papers), Power Quality and Harmonics (2 papers), Concrete Corrosion and Durability (2 papers), Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques (2 papers), Energy Load and Power Forecasting (2 papers), Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis (2 papers) and Advanced Control Systems Optimization (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Energy Engineering and Power Technology (26 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (135 citations), Automotive Engineering (60 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (282 citations) and Environmental Engineering (61 citations). Philip Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and China. Frequent co-authors include Yong–June Shin, Roger A. Dougal, Daniel F. Opila, Jing Sun, Hyeongjun Park, Raymond A. DeCarlo, Ilya Kolmanovsky, Richard Meyer, Steven D. Pekarek and Jong‐Gwan Yook. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology and IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact