Philip Seaton
Impact in
- Cultural Studies top 2%
- Japanese History and Culture
- Asian Culture and Media Studies
-
- Media, Gender, and Advertising
Papers in
-
- Japanese History and Culture 18
- Asian Culture and Media Studies 8
-
- Vietnamese History and Culture Studies 4
- Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics 3
- Socioeconomic Development in Asia 3
- Sport and Mega-Event Impacts 1
Philip Seaton
20 papers receiving 202 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Cultural Studies 89
- Gender Studies 33
- Museology 11
- Urban Studies 16
- Sociology and Political Science 104
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Seaton
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Seaton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Seaton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Seaton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Seaton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Seaton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Seaton. The network helps show where Philip Seaton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Philip Seaton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 57 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 46 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 28 | |
| 4 | Contents tourism in Japan : pilgrimages to "sacred sites" of popular culture | 2017 | 21 |
| 5 | 2010 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 9 | |
| 9 | The Theory and Practice of Contents Tourism | 2015 | 6 |
| 10 | 2005 | 6 | |
| 11 | Contents tourism and pop culture fandom : transnational tourist experiences | 2020 | 4 |
| 12 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 17 | On the trail of The Last Samurai (III) : Himeji and Kagoshima | 2019 | 1 |
| 18 | On the trail of The Last Samurai (I) : Taranaki | 2019 | 1 |
| 19 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 1 |
About Philip Seaton
Philip Seaton is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology and Communication, having authored 25 papers that have together received 233 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Japanese History and Culture (18 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (8 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (4 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (3 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (3 papers), Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (2 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (2 papers) and Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (89 citations), Gender Studies (33 citations), Museology (11 citations), Urban Studies (16 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (104 citations). Philip Seaton has collaborated with scholars based in Japan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include T. R. Marks and Hugh W. Pritchard. Their work appears in journals such as Japan Forum, Journal of War and Culture Studies, Japan focus, Japanese Studies and Journal of Tourism History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.